Home / Editorial policy

Evidence and corrections

Editorial Policy for AI SEO Course Reviews

How facts, missing evidence, prices, affiliate relationships, updates and corrections are handled across AISEOCourse.review.

AI SEO course facts are dated

Prices, member counts, ratings and review counts can move. When they matter to a review, they carry a check date. Historical observations remain in the ledger rather than being silently rewritten.

Unverified is not No

If a public curriculum does not confirm GEO, AEO, LLM citations, entity SEO or measurement training, the attribute is recorded as unverified unless there is enough evidence to call it absent.

Editorial judgments are separate

Buyer-fit statements, tradeoffs and value discussions are editorial interpretation. They are not represented as provider claims or objective measurements.

Corrections

When a provider changes a public fact or a factual error is identified, the page should be corrected and the modified date updated. Material changes to the Rainmakers public listing are added to the evidence ledger.

Affiliate relationships

A referral relationship does not turn provider claims into verified facts. The methodology and evidence labels remain the same whether or not a link can generate a referral benefit.

Unsure which format you need? The AI SEO course definition covers that before any brand comparison.